◆ PRODUCT DEMO · NO SIGNUP REQUIRED

This is what MarginFuse shows you.

Support Copilot is a fictional AI support product with 66 customers on three paid plans and a free tier, running entirely in dry-run. The figures below illustrate the original seeded month. The live workspace rolls forward with time: its selected period, prorated revenue, and totals may differ.

READ-ONLY · FICTIONAL DATA · NO ACCOUNT NEEDED

WORKSPACE · SUPPORT COPILOT · ○ DRY-RUN

CUSTOMERS

66

COST MORE THAN THEY PAY

▼ 4

PLANS

$29.00 · $99.00 · $299.00

POLICIES

1 dry-run · 1 draft

ILLUSTRATIVE SEEDED MONTH · FICTIONAL COMPANY · USD · MONTHLY SUBSCRIPTIONS

MARGIN PER CUSTOMER

Four of 66 customers are the entire problem.

The workspace ranks all 66. These are the four underwater ones plus the two that frame them - the worst and the healthiest end of the same month.

CUSTOMERPLANREVENUEAI COSTMARGIN
Zephyr WorksPro$99.00$626.40 EST▼ −532.7%
Nova LabsBasic$29.00$35.67 EST▼ −23.0%
Alder PointPro$99.00$118.60 EST▼ −19.8%
Bluepeak SystemsBasic$29.00$34.20 EST▼ −17.9%
Pixel NorthPro$99.00$62.20 EST◆ 37.2%
Acme StudioPro$99.00$18.40 EST● 81.4%

Averages hide this. Blended margin across 66 customers looks acceptable while Zephyr Works burns Pro-plan revenue six times over in one day and Nova Labs loses money quietly, every month, on a plan that looks fine on paper.

ILLUSTRATIVE SEEDED MONTH · FICTIONAL COMPANY · USD · ONE MONTH

COST PER FEATURE

Not all requests cost the same.

Features get cost and cost share, not a margin. A feature only has a gross margin if it earns revenue directly or you tell MarginFuse how to allocate revenue to it - so until you do, the workspace reports what a feature costs and refuses to invent the rest.

image_generation

GPT-IMAGE-1

the expensive one nothing was stopping - 24 requests in a single day cost more than six Pro subscriptions

document_analysis

CLAUDE-SONNET-4-5

heavy tokens, concentrated in a handful of document-first customers

ai_chat

GPT-4.1

the volume feature - every customer, every day

smart_reply

GPT-4.1-MINI

high volume, negligible cost - the shape you want

The single worst day in the month: Zephyr Works ran 24 image-generation requests on Aug 26 for $612.40 EST - against a $99.00 monthly subscription. Nothing in the product was watching that boundary.

ILLUSTRATIVE SEEDED MONTH · FICTIONAL COMPANY · USD · ONE MONTH

WHAT PROTECTION WOULD HAVE DONE

Every decision, simulated before it’s real.

In dry-run, policies watch traffic and record what they would have done. You inspect each decision before anything is allowed to act.

  • Protect Basic plan customer margin

    ○ DRY-RUN

    Downgrade gpt-4.1 chat requests to gpt-4.1-mini once a Basic-plan customer’s AI cost plus the next request would pass $25.00 in their billing period.

    ○ Dry-run: 6 Nova Labs requests crossed the boundary and would have run on the cheaper model - $1.95 EST avoided. Production was never touched.

  • Block runaway image generation

    ‖ DRAFT

    Block image_generation once the feature passes $60.00 of cost in one day.

    ‖ Draft, written the day after Zephyr Works’s spike. It has never run, so it has no evidence yet - and the report says so rather than crediting it with the spike it was written for.

The workspace separates two things this page keeps separate too: what the recorded decisions prove, and what replaying a policy over the full month suggests. They are different numbers because they measure different traffic, and the savings report says which is which rather than picking the bigger one.

ILLUSTRATIVE SEEDED MONTH · FICTIONAL COMPANY · USD · ONE MONTH

Now run it on your own traffic.

Add one track call and revenue from Stripe, RevenueCat, or declared plans to explore your own data - free, no credit card required.